Employers Can’t Back Out After Issuing Offer Letters (Post-Resignation): A Deep-Dive

on

Employers Can’t Back Out After Issuing Offer Letters (Post-Resignation): A Deep-Dive

Case spotlight: Matthew Johnson Dara v. Hindustan Urvarak & Rasayan Ltd., Delhi High Court, order dated 16 Oct 2024 (Justice Jyoti Singh).

1) Why this judgment matters

Switching jobs in India often means resigning first—and only then joining the new employer. The risk has always been the same: what if the new employer backs out after you’re relieved?
The Delhi High Court has now made the position clearer: once a candidate’s resignation is accepted and they’re formally relieved, the new employer cannot arbitrarily revoke the appointment they already offered. This protects job seekers from being stranded and pushes employers to honour commitments.

2) Facts in brief (as gleaned from the record)

  • A candidate received an offer/appointment from a new employer.

  • Relying on it, the candidate resigned from the previous job; the resignation was accepted and the candidate was formally relieved.

  • The new employer then attempted to cancel or withhold the appointment.

  • The High Court stepped in and restrained such arbitrary withdrawal.




3) Core holding

  • Arbitrary withdrawal after an offer/appointment is impermissible once the candidate has changed position (resigned and been relieved) relying on the employer’s representation.

  • Recruitment must meet the standards of fairness, transparency, and reasonableness—especially for State/public sector entities but increasingly persuasive for private employers as well.

  • The Court emphasised accountability: employers must stand by their commitments after triggering a candidate’s irreversible decision to separate from the previous job.

4) Legal foundations behind the decision

Although each case turns on its facts, you can understand the Court’s approach through these doctrines:

a) Promissory Estoppel / Detrimental Reliance

When A makes a clear promise (an offer/appointment) and B alters their position in reliance on it (resigns, loses seniority, benefits), equity stops A from going back—if enforcement is necessary to avoid injustice.
This doctrine prevents “heads I win, tails you lose” behaviour in recruitment.

b) Legitimate Expectation

An offer letter—especially from a public sector employer—creates an expectation that due process will be followed and the appointment will not be withdrawn arbitrarily. If the employer departs from this without fair reason or hearing, courts intervene.

c) Administrative Law Standards (for State/PSUs)

Public employers must act non-arbitrarily under Article 14 (equality before law). A sudden withdrawal after inducing resignation tends to fail the arbitrariness test.

d) Contract Law Lens

Even where formal “employment contract on joining” clauses exist, courts look at the totality:

  • Clarity of the offer/appointment;

  • The candidate’s foreseeable reliance;

  • Whether the employer gave specific, provable reasons (e.g., genuine background-verification failures, legal bars) and followed fair procedure.

5) What counts as valid reasons to rescind?

The judgment does not convert every offer into an unbreakable guarantee. It bars arbitrary withdrawal. Examples where rescission might still stand—if strictly proven and fairly handled:

  • Adverse background checks (material misrepresentation, forged documents).

  • Medical unfitness where the role legitimately requires certain standards, with equal-opportunity compliance.

  • Statutory disqualification (e.g., security clearance denial for a sensitive role).

  • Documented hiring freeze due to policy change or court/Regulator directions—provided it’s bona fide, uniform, and the candidate is compensated for reliance loss (courts may tailor relief).

Key: reasons must be genuine, pre-existing or law-mandated, communicated promptly, and accompanied by a fair hearing where appropriate.

6) Likely forms of relief

Courts balance specific performance (directing the employer to honour appointment) against practicality. In employment, remedies often include:

  • Direction to issue appointment/joining (especially for public employers where posts exist and process was complete).

  • Compensation for reliance loss (salary gap for the waiting period, notice-period buyout, relocation costs, reputational/credit impacts), if appointment is no longer feasible.

  • Costs against the employer for arbitrary action.

7) How this shifts behaviour—Practical playbooks

For HR/Recruiters (Do/Don’t)

Do

  • Issue clear, conditional language only where truly necessary (e.g., “subject to background verification/medical fitness”), and process those conditions fast.

  • Freeze hiring before releasing offers if budgets are uncertain.

  • If revocation is inevitable, document reasons, notify immediately, offer hearing/representation, and consider compensation for reliance loss.

  • Maintain an audit trail (emails, approvals, checklists).

Don’t

  • Don’t wait until the candidate has resigned and then revoke casually.

  • Don’t cite vague reasons (“business needs changed”) without evidence.

  • Don’t keep candidates in limbo; delay itself can be arbitrary.

For Candidates

  • Keep a paper trail: offer/appointment letter, emails, acceptance, resignation acceptance, relieving letter.

  • Before resigning, ask for joining formalities checklist and tentative joining date in writing.

  • If withdrawal occurs: send a formal representation (see template below), request reasons, and seek restoration/compensation. Consider legal notice if unresolved.

8) Quick compliance checklist (employers)

  1. Offer approval memo with budgeted headcount.

  2. Conditions (BGV/medical) stated narrowly and applied uniformly.

  3. Joining date & next steps shared in writing.

  4. Pre-joining verification finished before candidate’s last working day elsewhere where possible.

  5. Revocation protocol: reason memo → legal review → candidate notice → chance to respond → reasoned order → compensation evaluation.

  6. Record retention for audit/litigation.

9) Sample representation letter (candidate → employer)

Subject: Request to honour appointment / reasons for proposed withdrawal

Dear [HR Name],
I accepted your offer dated [date] for the position [title]. Relying on it, my previous employer accepted my resignation on [date] and I was relieved on [date] (letters attached).

I was informed on [date] that the appointment is being withdrawn/kept in abeyance. This causes severe prejudice after I changed my position based on your representation.

In light of the Delhi High Court decision in Matthew Johnson Dara v. Hindustan Urvarak & Rasayan Ltd. (16 Oct 2024) against arbitrary revocation post-resignation, I request that you:

  1. Confirm my appointment and joining immediately; or

  2. Provide detailed reasons with supporting material and a hearing; and

  3. In case joining is genuinely impossible, propose compensation for reliance loss (notice-buyout, interim salary, relocation, etc.).

I look forward to a prompt, reasoned response within 3 working days.

Regards,
[Name]
[Email | Phone]
Attachments: Offer letter; Acceptance; Resignation acceptance; Relieving letter.

10) FAQs

Q. Does this bind private companies?
The judgment directly binds the parties before the Court. Its principles—no arbitrariness, reliance-based fairness—are persuasive for private employers and strongly binding on public sector employers. Many private disputes settle quickly when this is cited.

Q. What if the offer said “contract commences only on joining”?
Such clauses help employers, but they don’t license bad-faith withdrawals after inducing resignation. Courts look at conduct + reliance, not just boilerplate.

Q. Can an employer delay joining indefinitely instead of revoking?
Indefinite silence/deferral can itself be arbitrary. Written reminders, a representation, and then legal notice help build your case.

Q. What if BGV finds a real discrepancy?
If material and proved, revocation may stand—but the employer should share reasons and documents, and allow a response.

11) Editorial take (Compliance Monk)

This ruling reflects a maturity shift in Indian employment law—recognising the real-world reliance candidates place on offer letters. It nudges employers toward front-loaded diligence (finish checks before triggering resignations) and reasoned decision-making. Expect to see:

  • Cleaner offer templates,

  • Faster BGV turnarounds, and

  • Compensation frameworks when genuine policy shocks occur.

Net effect: higher trust in the hiring market.


Once you’re relieved from your old job after accepting a new offer, the new employer can’t revoke arbitrarily—they must honour the appointment or show a lawful, proven reason.


#EmployeeRights #DelhiHighCourt #EmploymentLaw #JobSecurity #OfferLetter #Recruitment #WorkplaceRights #ComplianceMonk


Job Offer Cancelled After Resignation? Delhi HC’s Landmark Ruling Explained

Meta description (≤150 chars):
Delhi HC: After resignation & relief, employers can’t arbitrarily revoke appointments. Know your rights, remedies & HR compliance steps.

Disclaimer: This article is for general information and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific strategy, consult a qualified lawyer with your documents.

Comments

Post a Comment